Jordan Leaves Gallaudet With Painful Goodbye

Former President’s Legacy May Not Reflect His Tenure

By Susan Kinzie
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, January 8, 2007; B01

When I. King Jordan announced in fall 2005 to a hushed and expectant crowd at Gallaudet University that he would step down as president of the school for the deaf, people gasped. Many burst into tears. Dozens stood in line to thank him or to sign “I love you.”

That was then.

In the past year, he has faced an onslaught of protests over his support for an unpopular would-be successor, including effigies, a faculty no-confidence vote, insults and accusations, some lingering bitterly through the end of his term Dec. 31.

Jordan in 1988

At Gallaudet, for going on two decades, Jordan’s presidency inspired an intensity of feeling hard to imagine on any other campus. He came in as a hero, a charismatic spokesman who told the world, deaf and hearing, how much was attainable.

It has been a painful goodbye.

Jordan has said many times that the school changed his life, starting when he was a young man stricken deaf in a motorcycle accident who found an education, hope and purpose at Gallaudet. How he changed the private university as its leader is still up for debate.

Nearly everyone agrees that he beautified the historic campus in Northeast Washington, raised its profile and strengthened its relations with Congress. But in a wrenching final year, critics harshly questioned everything from race relations to academic integrity to the school’s relevance.

Robert Davila, who began as interim president this week, takes on a troubled university.

Time will tell whether the controversy that flared up over Jordan’s potential successor is soon forgotten or remains to redefine his legacy. One thing is certain: His tenure ended as explosively as it began.

A Powerful Symbol
Jordan rode in on a protest. In 1988, students were outraged that once again a hearing person had been chosen to lead Gallaudet. They demanded a “deaf president now,” shutting down the campus, marching through the streets of Washington — and they won.

Jordan immediately became a powerful symbol for a culture that wanted equal rights, not paternalism. Books such as “The Week the World Heard Gallaudet” were written. He was inundated with media and public speaking requests. And Jordan, who has a politician’s ease in crowds and a ready laugh, was just the person to be spokesman.

“If anybody took advantage of a PR opportunity, it was King,” trustee Ken Levinson said.

Fast forward a generation. The students now at Gallaudet grew up with changes Jordan helped bring about, such as the Americans with Disabilities Act. Jordan’s supporters said his improvements on campus include the incorporation of new visually oriented technology into classrooms.

“He managed to hold onto the teaching component and grow the research component,” of Gallaudet, said Stephen Joel Trachtenberg, the president of George Washington University. And he spread the word: “He’s so well spoken, so charming. He’s got a message. He’s got a story to tell.”

Trustee Frank Wu has marveled at Jordan’s ability to work a room, to raise money for the endowment and to ensure support from Congress.

Yet Jordan leaves a university whose future, he told the board in a letter obtained by The Washington Post, is uncertain.

It is a turning point in deaf education, as technology makes it easier for deaf and hard-of-hearing students to go to mainstream schools — most do, now, prompting some to question Gallaudet’s relevance. Jordan said the protests over the selection of an unpopular provost as the university’s next president were sparked by people who wanted the school to be a place apart, a center of deaf culture dominated by American Sign Language. “I believe strongly that if we give in now to the ‘absolutists,’ ” Jordan wrote to the board in November, urging a more inclusive view, “that the future of Gallaudet is threatened.”

And the university is under scrutiny: The federal Office of Management and Budget is reevaluating the school after rating its annual $100 million-plus appropriation an ineffective use of federal funding last year. In November, the school’s reaccreditation was delayed. And as the protest went on, some on campus took on issues at Gallaudet that had been under the surface. People questioned chronically low graduation rates, the perception of discrimination based on race or deafness, and, as protests continued to intensify, they increasingly challenged the integrity of the Jordan administration.

Unimaginable Finale
When Jane K. Fernandes was named incoming president May 1, students stormed outside, furious. But when Jordan arrived, they gathered around him respectfully, and he soon calmed the crowd.

“Growing up, he was a hero, icon and role model for me,” said Anthony Mowl, a senior then, who had gone to almost every home basketball game with Jordan.

A few days into May, hundreds of people packed into an auditorium to ask two trustees about the presidential search. The questions quickly turned to Jordan; he interviewed finalists, and many said he had pushed his protege into office. When Prof. E. Lynn Jacobowitz said, “I don’t trust King Jordan,” the trustees looked stunned, and the crowd erupted.

“I used to think the world of him,” she signed. “I loved him to death. . . . But now, after what has happened, my trust in him . . . has completely collapsed.”

She told the trustees, “King has been twisting your arms all along.”

From that point on, the protest was not just about Fernandes.

Mowl, like Jacobowitz and many others, found himself fighting his mentor.

Over the summer, Jordan announced strict new rules governing expression on campus and continued to define the protests as a cultural battle led by deaf extremists.

Meanwhile, deaf blogs simmered, with some reluctant to tarnish his image but others attacking “King’s rule” at Gallaudet. In early October, protesters who felt he had stifled their voices and distorted their arguments did something that would have been unthinkable a year earlier: They disrupted a building-naming ceremony honoring Jordan and his family. And they chiseled his name off the wall.

On Oct. 11, a group of students announced their takeover of the school: “We are ousting Dr. Irving King Jordan from the position of president of this university due to the unethical actions carried out by the university administration.”

On Oct. 13, he had more than 130 protesters arrested.

The next morning, Jordan said that he had never faced a more difficult decision but that students were blocking campus entrances and he needed to restore order and safety. The protests in 1988 pulled together all kinds of deaf people for one goal. “Now the exact opposite thing is happening,” he said. “The community is splitting.”

Protesters said the deaf community was united as never before. It was just that this time he was on the other side.

“Dr. Jordan betrayed us,” student leader Ryan Commerson said.

The past year has been extremely tough on Jordan, Levinson said. “I have tremendous respect for him for sticking to what he felt was right, in spite of all the pressure.”

Mowl said, “I don’t see him as perfect anymore, but he still is a role model for me in terms of what I could do as a deaf person, and that’ll never change.”

It is time, Mowl added, for a new generation of deaf leaders to step forward.

Since the board voted at the end of October to terminate Fernandes’s appointment — a decision Jordan told them in no uncertain terms was a mistake — he has given only one interview. For the man who has been the spokesman of the deaf community for the past two decades, it has been a dramatic silence. And an unlikely ending.

####################################################

I’m giving away some of my books for FREE! Visit the link below to see what you can get!

Mooch Me!

Advertisements

15 thoughts on “Jordan Leaves Gallaudet With Painful Goodbye

  1. Bison Chaser,

    I can PROVE you are wrong!

    Watch this video of Senator Harkin’s speech at Jordan’s inauguration in Oct. 1988. In the speech, Harkin talks about the party in the Ole Gym after we won DPN and said he wishes he was there:

    [video src="http://gallyprotest.org/harkin.wmv" /]

  2. anne Marie,
    The protesters have been trying to deny that burning effigies shows how unAmerican and uneducated they were. I never saw any burning effigies here in this country but often by the savages out of here. Do you think that USA Senators and Congressmen approve of effigies along with staff and students drinking liquors together on federal property at Gally that night? No Way!
    You the protesters are losers in the end, sorry. I see no healing but confusing chaos among the deaf society now.

  3. The IKJ legacy at Gallaudet University will be throughly examined from time to time.

    IKJ failed the Gallaudet community many times without raising the standards within the deaf education among the educational facilities of the deaf. He turned Gallaudet University into the assembly line without making a fine or excellent product (students and faculty members). IKj micromanaged the entire university and affilates.

    My next article will be on the laundry list of IKJ’s countless failures. One of them is thriving academic freedom within IKJ’s leadership.

    Robert L. Mason (RLM)

  4. Blue Fox

    Logic 101:

    1) Get fired, scramble for back up saving with unemployment income in half to keep mortgage and foods on table, the look for a job..ha ha..the high chance is just move out of state for most deaf people or change career completely or demote.

    2) Burning effigies: harm done is to straws and tyrannies’ egos but they are actually nothing compared to many workers especially deaf people’ lives and 90% morale and intellectual suppression on the campus for 18 years.

    Stop whining and get real!

  5. Burning effigies is a valid (and very strong) form of free speech. That’s common knowledge.

    You’re grasping at straws, Blue Fox, and have no real arguments. You just have claims without supporting facts or evidence.

  6. Anne Marie
    Do you mean that the protesters and leaders are not corrupted?
    I have seen how some leaders were around goating and smirking at JKF’s effigies. You have to swallow and admit that action was truly barbaric and sign of the dark age like the frantic muslims. Eeek but the world has already seen that. What a blow of embarrassment. smile

  7. Please re-read Robert E. Johnson’s 17 pages essay and endless testimonies of people from inside. Jordan and his people are simply corrupted whether you like it or not.

    Millions of dollars in endowment, licking fattening salaries of administrators including Jane Fernades’s and platituding campus come from many good workers being fired and programs cutting. They are FACTS whether you like it or not.

    Anne Marie

  8. Anonymous,
    Well written! I agree with you all the way.
    I saw how Gallaudet changed into a beautiful university via IKJ’s hard work. He had many connections with many politicans through his intelligency and charism. He was a beautiful man.
    Gallaudet is beginning to tarnish too fast after he departed as if Gallaudet has turned from gold into a cheap piece of silver. Only JKF can polish Gallaudet into gold again. You may laugh at me but WATCH.

  9. Anonymous,

    Is this a joke? Obviously you are a Jordan supporter, perhaps even Jordan himself.

    Give as a break and stop insulting our intelligence.

    Jordan was a divisive presense. Good riddance to him. History will judge him harshly, and silly anonymous comments like yours will not help him.

  10. I wonder why WashingtonPost reporter interviewed Ken “Music-Mouth Oralist”Levinson who is the member of Alexander Graham Bell Society…

  11. I read your post with interest. The word, “absolutists”, in the following passage is so eye-catching that has prompted me to pose a question: Who are absolutists? Is Prof. Jacobswitz amongst them? Not only did Jordan deny constitutional rights to those who do not agree with him but I suspect that he also did not realise that he had turned the Gallaudet community non-egalitarian community.

    “strongly that if we give in now to the ‘absolutists,’ ” Jordan wrote to the board in November, urging a more inclusive view, “that the future of Gallaudet is threatened.”

    Jean Boutcher

  12. MM,

    You are in denial. Wake up and make an honest assessment of the situation. Jordan almost destroyed Gallaudet. The protesters saved it.

    Click on my name below this line to read the Gallyprotest press release:

  13. Please. As a former student at Gallaudet, I was alarmed when Jordan started to silence the Faculty Senate in early 1990s, then was alarmed when Jordan started to insert people without the approval of Deans, then was alarmed when Jordan decided to alter the Communication Statement, then was alarmed when Jordan went after Roz Rosen.

    And you’re complaining that he was treated shabbily at the end, MM?

    He asked for it.

    R-

  14. Considering how much he did for the deaf, he was treated rather shabbily at the end. What encouragement is there for others to follow ? Whatever the rights or wrongs protesters perceived, they should recognize the huge amount he has done for them,and apologise at least.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s